<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1087 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363779</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted transfer pricing adjustment matters in the Transport segment back to the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee to present additional evidence. Leasehold improvement expenses were treated as capital expenditure with directions to grant depreciation. The issue of interest on outstanding receivables was also sent back for fresh adjudication based on principles from a Delhi High Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1087 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363779</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted transfer pricing adjustment matters in the Transport segment back to the AO/TPO for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee to present additional evidence. Leasehold improvement expenses were treated as capital expenditure with directions to grant depreciation. The issue of interest on outstanding receivables was also sent back for fresh adjudication based on principles from a Delhi High Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>