<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 93 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13725</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on karkhanadars&#039; statements for determining inflation in purchases, rejecting the assessee&#039;s challenge due to lack of prior request for copies for cross-examination. The Court affirmed the addition in the trading account based on evidence of inflated purchase rates, supporting the Revenue against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52733" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 93 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13725</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s reliance on karkhanadars&#039; statements for determining inflation in purchases, rejecting the assessee&#039;s challenge due to lack of prior request for copies for cross-examination. The Court affirmed the addition in the trading account based on evidence of inflated purchase rates, supporting the Revenue against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>