https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363758 The court rejected the petitioner's writ petition challenging the seizure of Betel Nuts under the Customs Act, 1962. It held that statutory remedies must be exhausted before seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution, leading to the dismissal of the petition for provisional release. The petitioner was directed to obtain the order rejecting the release application from the appropriate authority in compliance with the Customs Act, 1962. en-us Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:13:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363758 The court rejected the petitioner's writ petition challenging the seizure of Betel Nuts under the Customs Act, 1962. It held that statutory remedies must be exhausted before seeking relief under Article 226 of the Constitution, leading to the dismissal of the petition for provisional release. The petitioner was directed to obtain the order rejecting the release application from the appropriate authority in compliance with the Customs Act, 1962. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363758