https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363743 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the confiscation of finished goods and penalties imposed. The decision was based on the lack of evidence to support the allegations of clandestine removal of goods and non-compliance with weighment procedures during stock verification. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the goods could not be confiscated under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules unless removed from the factory without payment of duty. The appellants' argument regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on inputs was accepted, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing both appeals. en-us Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:12:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363743 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the confiscation of finished goods and penalties imposed. The decision was based on the lack of evidence to support the allegations of clandestine removal of goods and non-compliance with weighment procedures during stock verification. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the goods could not be confiscated under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules unless removed from the factory without payment of duty. The appellants' argument regarding the admissibility of Cenvat credit on inputs was accepted, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing both appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363743