https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273853 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to demand recovery of CENVAT credit on service tax paid for Marine Policy, Travel Agents Services, and Rent-a-Cab services. The Tribunal relied on precedents from the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, specifically the cases of Principal Commissioner vs. Essar Oil Limited and Commissioner vs. Dynamic Industries Limited, to determine the eligibility of CENVAT credit on these services. The appellant's argument that the period in question was covered by the High Court's decision and a relevant circular was accepted, leading to the appeal's success. en-us Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:08:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273853 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner's decision to demand recovery of CENVAT credit on service tax paid for Marine Policy, Travel Agents Services, and Rent-a-Cab services. The Tribunal relied on precedents from the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, specifically the cases of Principal Commissioner vs. Essar Oil Limited and Commissioner vs. Dynamic Industries Limited, to determine the eligibility of CENVAT credit on these services. The appellant's argument that the period in question was covered by the High Court's decision and a relevant circular was accepted, leading to the appeal's success. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273853