<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273859</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 49 lakhs to the Assessee&#039;s income for the Assessment Year 2003-04. It was found that the document in question lacked clear relevance to the Assessee, lacked essential details, and no forensic evidence was presented to prove its authenticity. The addition was deemed speculative, made solely on suspicion without corroborative material. The Court emphasized the lack of a direct link between the document and the Assessee&#039;s income or projects, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 06:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1172 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273859</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 49 lakhs to the Assessee&#039;s income for the Assessment Year 2003-04. It was found that the document in question lacked clear relevance to the Assessee, lacked essential details, and no forensic evidence was presented to prove its authenticity. The addition was deemed speculative, made solely on suspicion without corroborative material. The Court emphasized the lack of a direct link between the document and the Assessee&#039;s income or projects, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>