<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 101 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s good faith in property valuation and liability disclosure, leading to the rejection of concealment charges. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s actions were genuine, based on a belief in legal ownership of the property and proper disclosure of liabilities, resulting in the dismissal of charges of concealing wealth particulars and furnishing inaccurate information. The appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial question of law was raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 101 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth-tax Act. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings, emphasizing the assessee&#039;s good faith in property valuation and liability disclosure, leading to the rejection of concealment charges. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee&#039;s actions were genuine, based on a belief in legal ownership of the property and proper disclosure of liabilities, resulting in the dismissal of charges of concealing wealth particulars and furnishing inaccurate information. The appeal was dismissed without costs as no substantial question of law was raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>