<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1043 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363735</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the special leave petition was dismissed because the tax effect was low, being only Rs. 2,64,000. The order reflects the practical application of the low tax effect threshold in income tax litigation, with no further substantive issue decided. Pending applications, if any, were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:11:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1043 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363735</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the special leave petition was dismissed because the tax effect was low, being only Rs. 2,64,000. The order reflects the practical application of the low tax effect threshold in income tax litigation, with no further substantive issue decided. Pending applications, if any, were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363735</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>