<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1015 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision not to impose penalties under section 114AA on specific individuals, emphasizing that separate penalties cannot be imposed on sole proprietorship firms and their proprietors when penalties on the firms have been imposed. The Tribunal clarified that penalties under section 114AA apply to both import and export cases, disagreeing with the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s interpretation. Penalties under section 112(a)(i) were set aside due to valuation discrepancies and misdeclaration, leading to the conclusion that penalties under section 114AA were not applicable. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment provided a thorough analysis of the issues and legal principles involved, ensuring a just outcome based on established law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:09:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1015 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision not to impose penalties under section 114AA on specific individuals, emphasizing that separate penalties cannot be imposed on sole proprietorship firms and their proprietors when penalties on the firms have been imposed. The Tribunal clarified that penalties under section 114AA apply to both import and export cases, disagreeing with the Ld. Commissioner&#039;s interpretation. Penalties under section 112(a)(i) were set aside due to valuation discrepancies and misdeclaration, leading to the conclusion that penalties under section 114AA were not applicable. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment provided a thorough analysis of the issues and legal principles involved, ensuring a just outcome based on established law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>