<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1013 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363705</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid on lease of land was held admissible for an SEZ unit where the land was used for authorised operations approved in the Letter of Approval and the Bond-cum-LUT requirement had been satisfied. The timing of the lease deed, even if it preceded acceptance of the bond, was not treated as a bar to refund because the notification focuses on use of services for authorised SEZ operations and compliance with the prescribed bond condition. The refund claim was therefore upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:09:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1013 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363705</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid on lease of land was held admissible for an SEZ unit where the land was used for authorised operations approved in the Letter of Approval and the Bond-cum-LUT requirement had been satisfied. The timing of the lease deed, even if it preceded acceptance of the bond, was not treated as a bar to refund because the notification focuses on use of services for authorised SEZ operations and compliance with the prescribed bond condition. The refund claim was therefore upheld and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363705</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>