<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, engaged in Commercial Training and Coaching Services, was entitled to Cenvat Credit for service tax paid to advertising agencies for publishing advertisements in print media. The Tribunal concluded that the service provided by advertising agencies fell within the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the CCR, 2004. Therefore, the denial of Cenvat Credit by the Revenue was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1012 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, engaged in Commercial Training and Coaching Services, was entitled to Cenvat Credit for service tax paid to advertising agencies for publishing advertisements in print media. The Tribunal concluded that the service provided by advertising agencies fell within the definition of input service under Rule 2(l) of the CCR, 2004. Therefore, the denial of Cenvat Credit by the Revenue was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>