<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1005 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a telecommunication service provider, in a dispute over the calculation of service tax on services provided to PCO operators. The Tribunal held that the discount given to PCO operators should not be included in the taxable value for service tax purposes, based on legal provisions and a previous decision. The Tribunal referred to Notification No. 2/2011 but noted that since it was effective from March 1, 2011, the demand for service tax on the entire amount collected by PCO operators before that date was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:09:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1005 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a telecommunication service provider, in a dispute over the calculation of service tax on services provided to PCO operators. The Tribunal held that the discount given to PCO operators should not be included in the taxable value for service tax purposes, based on legal provisions and a previous decision. The Tribunal referred to Notification No. 2/2011 but noted that since it was effective from March 1, 2011, the demand for service tax on the entire amount collected by PCO operators before that date was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the demand for service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>