https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363693 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Dixon Cargo Consolidators Pvt. Ltd., setting aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal ruled that the demand beyond the normal limitation period was not valid, highlighting doubts in the case and rejecting the extended period of limitation. The judgment was in favor of the appellant on June 7, 2018. en-us Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:09:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363693 The Tribunal allowed the appeal by M/s Dixon Cargo Consolidators Pvt. Ltd., setting aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalty under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal ruled that the demand beyond the normal limitation period was not valid, highlighting doubts in the case and rejecting the extended period of limitation. The judgment was in favor of the appellant on June 7, 2018. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363693