<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 992 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the applicability of interest provisions under Section 11BB of the Act and relevant legal precedents. The decision highlighted the importance of granting interest on delayed refunds post three months from the refund claim date, despite the absence of a specific directive in the previous Tribunal order or a provision for interest under the 2010 Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 992 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the applicability of interest provisions under Section 11BB of the Act and relevant legal precedents. The decision highlighted the importance of granting interest on delayed refunds post three months from the refund claim date, despite the absence of a specific directive in the previous Tribunal order or a provision for interest under the 2010 Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>