https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363672 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order, as the appellant met the exemption criteria under Notification 67/1995-CE by complying with Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant's non-availment of Cenvat Credit for inputs used in exempted goods established eligibility for exemption on intermediate goods, specifically plastic powder, used in the manufacturing process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of Rule 6(1) compliance for claiming exemptions on intermediate goods, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on their adherence to the said rule. en-us Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:08:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363672 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned order, as the appellant met the exemption criteria under Notification 67/1995-CE by complying with Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The appellant's non-availment of Cenvat Credit for inputs used in exempted goods established eligibility for exemption on intermediate goods, specifically plastic powder, used in the manufacturing process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of Rule 6(1) compliance for claiming exemptions on intermediate goods, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant based on their adherence to the said rule. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363672