<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 979 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s valuation principle under the Customs Act, 1962 for goods manufactured and cleared by a 100% EOU. The appeals were dismissed as the Tribunal found that the duty on finished goods should compensate for the customs duty foregone on imported raw materials, aligning with the export-oriented objective of 100% EOUs. The decision was based on the specific provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the need for duty structure to reflect the import benefits availed by such units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:08:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 979 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s valuation principle under the Customs Act, 1962 for goods manufactured and cleared by a 100% EOU. The appeals were dismissed as the Tribunal found that the duty on finished goods should compensate for the customs duty foregone on imported raw materials, aligning with the export-oriented objective of 100% EOUs. The decision was based on the specific provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the need for duty structure to reflect the import benefits availed by such units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>