https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363668 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant concerning the availment of cenvat credit on capital goods not physically present at their manufacturing premises. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments regarding the use of additional premises for job-work and captive consumption, as well as compliance with Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' decision, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions and established precedents in reaching a favorable outcome for the appellant. en-us Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jul 2018 07:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363668 The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellant concerning the availment of cenvat credit on capital goods not physically present at their manufacturing premises. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments regarding the use of additional premises for job-work and captive consumption, as well as compliance with Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. The Tribunal set aside the lower authorities' decision, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions and established precedents in reaching a favorable outcome for the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363668