https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273827 A government servant appointed substantively outside his parent cadre cannot invoke the suspended-lien rule to resist repatriation while claiming a right to remain in the ex cadre post. Rule 3.14 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules was held to protect an employee who wishes to return to the parent department, not one opposing return. Once the employee was declared entitled to continue substantively as Excise Sub-Inspector, his lien in the Police Department stood cancelled because two liens cannot subsist simultaneously in different cadres. The Excise Commissioner was therefore the competent authority to impose compulsory retirement, and the challenge failed. en-us Thu, 03 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:00:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273827 A government servant appointed substantively outside his parent cadre cannot invoke the suspended-lien rule to resist repatriation while claiming a right to remain in the ex cadre post. Rule 3.14 of the Punjab Civil Services Rules was held to protect an employee who wishes to return to the parent department, not one opposing return. Once the employee was declared entitled to continue substantively as Excise Sub-Inspector, his lien in the Police Department stood cancelled because two liens cannot subsist simultaneously in different cadres. The Excise Commissioner was therefore the competent authority to impose compulsory retirement, and the challenge failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273827