<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (7) TMI 1339 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273823</link>
    <description>Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure limits compelled witness attendance to persons acquainted with the facts who reside within the investigating officer&#039;s police station or an adjoining police station; the territorial wording is mandatory, so a witness residing outside that area cannot be required to attend. Section 91 permits production of documents or things without insisting on personal appearance, because compliance may be made by causing the materials to be produced at the stated time and place. On that construction, notices demanding attendance from outside the territorial limit were invalid, and personal appearance for document production was unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2023 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (7) TMI 1339 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273823</link>
      <description>Section 160 of the Code of Criminal Procedure limits compelled witness attendance to persons acquainted with the facts who reside within the investigating officer&#039;s police station or an adjoining police station; the territorial wording is mandatory, so a witness residing outside that area cannot be required to attend. Section 91 permits production of documents or things without insisting on personal appearance, because compliance may be made by causing the materials to be produced at the stated time and place. On that construction, notices demanding attendance from outside the territorial limit were invalid, and personal appearance for document production was unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>