https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273818 An extra-judicial confession was rejected because it was improbable in the circumstances, and the statement before the Magistrate did not amount to a clear, true or voluntary admission of guilt; the acquittal under murder and cruelty charges was therefore upheld. The materials also failed to establish the foundational facts for dowry death: contemporaneous statements at the inquest supported accidental death by fall into a well, and the medical evidence was consistent with that explanation. As the alleged dowry demand and homicidal version were not proved, the ingredients of dowry death were not made out and the presumption under Section 113-B did not arise. en-us Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Jul 2018 13:19:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273818 An extra-judicial confession was rejected because it was improbable in the circumstances, and the statement before the Magistrate did not amount to a clear, true or voluntary admission of guilt; the acquittal under murder and cruelty charges was therefore upheld. The materials also failed to establish the foundational facts for dowry death: contemporaneous statements at the inquest supported accidental death by fall into a well, and the medical evidence was consistent with that explanation. As the alleged dowry demand and homicidal version were not proved, the ingredients of dowry death were not made out and the presumption under Section 113-B did not arise. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273818