<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 100 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13701</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling in favor of the assessee. The court emphasized that the joint account&#039;s factual position was not conclusively proven, and the mother was not a mere benamidar. The court held that as long as the decision regarding the mother for a previous assessment year remained unchallenged and final, the Revenue could not dispute it in this case. The judgment highlighted the burden of proof in establishing a transaction as benami and the significance of previous decisions in related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:02:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 100 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13701</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, ruling in favor of the assessee. The court emphasized that the joint account&#039;s factual position was not conclusively proven, and the mother was not a mere benamidar. The court held that as long as the decision regarding the mother for a previous assessment year remained unchallenged and final, the Revenue could not dispute it in this case. The judgment highlighted the burden of proof in establishing a transaction as benami and the significance of previous decisions in related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13701</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>