<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (5) TMI 792 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273816</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for decision, finding the Tribunal&#039;s order lacking reasons. The appellant contested duty demands and penalties for alleged illicit fabric removal. The Tribunal set aside the order, emphasizing proper reasoning and adherence to natural justice principles. The appellant&#039;s retracted statement and evidentiary value were questioned, highlighting discrepancies in the investigation. The case lacked proper scrutiny, leading to a remand for thorough reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 10:08:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (5) TMI 792 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273816</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for decision, finding the Tribunal&#039;s order lacking reasons. The appellant contested duty demands and penalties for alleged illicit fabric removal. The Tribunal set aside the order, emphasizing proper reasoning and adherence to natural justice principles. The appellant&#039;s retracted statement and evidentiary value were questioned, highlighting discrepancies in the investigation. The case lacked proper scrutiny, leading to a remand for thorough reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>