<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 940 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the matter back to the A.O. for fresh adjudication. The A.O. was directed to refer the property valuation to the DVO and determine the fair market value for computing capital gains. The Tribunal also allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for statistical purposes, permitting the assessee to raise any other relevant grounds before the A.O.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527054" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 940 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)&#039;s order and remitted the matter back to the A.O. for fresh adjudication. The A.O. was directed to refer the property valuation to the DVO and determine the fair market value for computing capital gains. The Tribunal also allowed the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections for statistical purposes, permitting the assessee to raise any other relevant grounds before the A.O.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>