https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363615 Disciplinary proceedings against a chartered accountant were held not to be barred by limitation, as no material showed the initiation or continuation of the action was time-barred. The authority found professional misconduct under Clauses (7) and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule because the audit working papers were vague, incomplete, and did not show proper examination, sufficient information, or due diligence before certifying the financial statements. On that basis, the disciplinary punishment was not interfered with and the appeals failed. en-us Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 02 Apr 2019 10:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363615 Disciplinary proceedings against a chartered accountant were held not to be barred by limitation, as no material showed the initiation or continuation of the action was time-barred. The authority found professional misconduct under Clauses (7) and (8) of Part I of the Second Schedule because the audit working papers were vague, incomplete, and did not show proper examination, sufficient information, or due diligence before certifying the financial statements. On that basis, the disciplinary punishment was not interfered with and the appeals failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363615