<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 918 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363610</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed the confirmation of a Service Tax demand of Rs. 1,64,44,454 along with penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. The Appellant, engaged in construction services, faced allegations of not obtaining Service Tax registration and not fulfilling their Work Contract Service liability. The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles as the Appellant was not heard before the order was passed. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for redetermination of the demand based on the Appellant&#039;s submission of relevant documents, ensuring a fair process and upholding natural justice principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 08:07:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 918 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363610</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed the confirmation of a Service Tax demand of Rs. 1,64,44,454 along with penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act. The Appellant, engaged in construction services, faced allegations of not obtaining Service Tax registration and not fulfilling their Work Contract Service liability. The Tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles as the Appellant was not heard before the order was passed. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for redetermination of the demand based on the Appellant&#039;s submission of relevant documents, ensuring a fair process and upholding natural justice principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>