<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1326 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273812</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the department. The Court agreed that the discounts allowed were not subject to tax deduction at source under Section 194H as they were considered principal-to-principal transactions, not commission-based. The Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the deletion of disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 12:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1326 - RAJASTHAN  HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273812</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a tax case, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the department. The Court agreed that the discounts allowed were not subject to tax deduction at source under Section 194H as they were considered principal-to-principal transactions, not commission-based. The Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the deletion of disallowance for non-deduction of tax at source.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273812</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>