<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 810 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to include the fair market value of unaccounted jewellery in the assessee&#039;s total income. It acknowledged the possession of 1000 grams of jewellery acquired from the father but found insufficient evidence to support ownership of the remaining jewellery. The Tribunal deemed transactions with M/s M.R. Jewellers as genuine, applying Section 69A to determine the fair market value of the jewellery.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 11:36:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 810 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, directing the AO to include the fair market value of unaccounted jewellery in the assessee&#039;s total income. It acknowledged the possession of 1000 grams of jewellery acquired from the father but found insufficient evidence to support ownership of the remaining jewellery. The Tribunal deemed transactions with M/s M.R. Jewellers as genuine, applying Section 69A to determine the fair market value of the jewellery.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>