<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 106 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13688</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue, stating that the amendment to section 139(8) of the Income-tax Act made the levy of interest automatic for late filing of returns, removing the Assessing Officer&#039;s discretion. The court found that the Tribunal erred in canceling the penalty solely based on the interest levy under section 139(8) and directed a reconsideration of the case, emphasizing the importance of considering the amended provisions and the automatic nature of interest levy post-amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52696" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 106 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13688</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the Revenue, stating that the amendment to section 139(8) of the Income-tax Act made the levy of interest automatic for late filing of returns, removing the Assessing Officer&#039;s discretion. The court found that the Tribunal erred in canceling the penalty solely based on the interest levy under section 139(8) and directed a reconsideration of the case, emphasizing the importance of considering the amended provisions and the automatic nature of interest levy post-amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>