<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 880 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363572</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to interfere in the impugned order in view of the peculiar facts and its discretionary supervisory jurisdiction. The Special Leave Petition was therefore dismissed without any further merits reasoning. The Court also expressly left the substantive question of law open, and did not decide that issue in this order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 880 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363572</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned, but the Supreme Court declined to interfere in the impugned order in view of the peculiar facts and its discretionary supervisory jurisdiction. The Special Leave Petition was therefore dismissed without any further merits reasoning. The Court also expressly left the substantive question of law open, and did not decide that issue in this order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>