<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 868 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363560</link>
    <description>Supplies from a domestic tariff area to a 100% export oriented unit were treated as deemed exports under the unamended Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014, and paragraph 8.3(c) allowed refund of terminal excise duty where the supplies were not made against international competitive bidding. The later amendment of 18.04.2013 introduced a different regime, making such supplies ab initio exempt and limiting refund to cases where exemption was unavailable, but that change did not apply to earlier claims. A 15.03.2013 circular could not override the unamended policy. Duty paid through the CENVAT credit route did not defeat entitlement for the pre-amendment period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2019 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 868 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363560</link>
      <description>Supplies from a domestic tariff area to a 100% export oriented unit were treated as deemed exports under the unamended Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014, and paragraph 8.3(c) allowed refund of terminal excise duty where the supplies were not made against international competitive bidding. The later amendment of 18.04.2013 introduced a different regime, making such supplies ab initio exempt and limiting refund to cases where exemption was unavailable, but that change did not apply to earlier claims. A 15.03.2013 circular could not override the unamended policy. Duty paid through the CENVAT credit route did not defeat entitlement for the pre-amendment period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>