<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 177 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13684</link>
    <description>The High Court of Gujarat held that when the issue of deduction or disallowance is debatable, the Assessing Officer cannot make adjustments under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that decisions on debatable points of law are not considered mistakes apparent from records. Consequently, the court found in favor of the assessee, stating no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order, and disposed of the reference accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 177 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13684</link>
      <description>The High Court of Gujarat held that when the issue of deduction or disallowance is debatable, the Assessing Officer cannot make adjustments under section 143(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court emphasized that decisions on debatable points of law are not considered mistakes apparent from records. Consequently, the court found in favor of the assessee, stating no infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s order, and disposed of the reference accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>