https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363558 The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty, emphasizing that the error in judgment, if any, could only be corrected through an appeal. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority with specific directions, clarifying that the authority must follow the Jindal Industries case law. The Tribunal highlighted that the appellant would not be prejudiced as the matter would be decided afresh, and any decision in favor of the appellant could be considered in the new proceedings. Ultimately, the application for rectification was dismissed, and the decision was rendered on 20th June 2018. en-us Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363558 The Tribunal rejected the application for rectification regarding the imposition of anti-dumping duty, emphasizing that the error in judgment, if any, could only be corrected through an appeal. The matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority with specific directions, clarifying that the authority must follow the Jindal Industries case law. The Tribunal highlighted that the appellant would not be prejudiced as the matter would be decided afresh, and any decision in favor of the appellant could be considered in the new proceedings. Ultimately, the application for rectification was dismissed, and the decision was rendered on 20th June 2018. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 20 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363558