<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 852 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of excise duty for the entire period, along with the penalty under Section 11AC related to the extended period. The penalty for the normal period was set aside, and the personal penalty on the employee was also revoked. Therefore, the appeals were partly allowed based on the above findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526915" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 852 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of excise duty for the entire period, along with the penalty under Section 11AC related to the extended period. The penalty for the normal period was set aside, and the personal penalty on the employee was also revoked. Therefore, the appeals were partly allowed based on the above findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>