<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 851 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the ground of being time-barred without addressing the classification of software for excise duty or the inclusion of software value in the assessable value of machines. The decision emphasized the significance of audit reports in determining the time bar on excise duty demands and stressed the importance of consistency in applying such limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 851 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the ground of being time-barred without addressing the classification of software for excise duty or the inclusion of software value in the assessable value of machines. The decision emphasized the significance of audit reports in determining the time bar on excise duty demands and stressed the importance of consistency in applying such limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>