<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands related to credit disallowance on capital goods and input services, suppression of facts, separate registration requirement, and disallowance of credit on specific services. The judgment emphasized the lack of evidence of suppression and the appellant&#039;s diligence in complying with registration and disclosure requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:48:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 849 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands related to credit disallowance on capital goods and input services, suppression of facts, separate registration requirement, and disallowance of credit on specific services. The judgment emphasized the lack of evidence of suppression and the appellant&#039;s diligence in complying with registration and disclosure requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>