<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 837 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363529</link>
    <description>In classification disputes under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, goods must be classified according to their commercial parlance meaning and the context of the schedule entry. On the assessment records and invoices, the assessee&#039;s goods were treated by chemical suppliers as synthetic organic dyes, including basic dyes and acid dyes, and Entry 16 specifically covered dyes, while Entry 18(ii) and (iii) covered paints, colours and pigments. The placement of the entries supported treating dyes as a separate class. As the appellate authority and Tribunal&#039;s findings were supported by relevant material, they were not shown to be perverse and no interference was warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:47:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 837 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363529</link>
      <description>In classification disputes under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, goods must be classified according to their commercial parlance meaning and the context of the schedule entry. On the assessment records and invoices, the assessee&#039;s goods were treated by chemical suppliers as synthetic organic dyes, including basic dyes and acid dyes, and Entry 16 specifically covered dyes, while Entry 18(ii) and (iii) covered paints, colours and pigments. The placement of the entries supported treating dyes as a separate class. As the appellate authority and Tribunal&#039;s findings were supported by relevant material, they were not shown to be perverse and no interference was warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363529</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>