<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1411 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273793</link>
    <description>An earlier Bombay HC decision between the same parties on identical questions for prior assessment years had already decided the issues against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. On that binding basis, no fresh substantial question of law survived in the Revenue&#039;s appeal for assessment year 2009-10. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable on merits and was dismissed, leaving the assessee successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1411 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273793</link>
      <description>An earlier Bombay HC decision between the same parties on identical questions for prior assessment years had already decided the issues against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. On that binding basis, no fresh substantial question of law survived in the Revenue&#039;s appeal for assessment year 2009-10. The appeal was therefore held not maintainable on merits and was dismissed, leaving the assessee successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273793</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>