<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1373 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273783</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed Mr. M.P. Devnath&#039;s writ petition as he sought to withdraw it. The petitioner was allowed to challenge the order if prejudicial, and the authority was directed to consider the reply promptly. Another application was dismissed as infructuous based on the writ petition&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1373 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273783</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi dismissed Mr. M.P. Devnath&#039;s writ petition as he sought to withdraw it. The petitioner was allowed to challenge the order if prejudicial, and the authority was directed to consider the reply promptly. Another application was dismissed as infructuous based on the writ petition&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>