<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1682 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273794</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction is confined to narrow legal limits and cannot be used as a substitute for rehearing. The HC reiterated that a review lies only where an error apparent on the face of the record or another recognised ground is shown. As no such error was demonstrated despite consideration of the record, the review petition was found to lack merit and was dismissed summarily.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2018 07:47:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526889" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1682 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273794</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction is confined to narrow legal limits and cannot be used as a substitute for rehearing. The HC reiterated that a review lies only where an error apparent on the face of the record or another recognised ground is shown. As no such error was demonstrated despite consideration of the record, the review petition was found to lack merit and was dismissed summarily.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273794</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>