<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1760 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273777</link>
    <description>The court quashed the summoning orders for the complaints filed against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court clarified that the cheques issued by the petitioner were for security purposes and not for the discharge of any existing liability. As such, the court held that Section 138 was not applicable in this case, allowing the petitions for quashing the complaints.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1760 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273777</link>
      <description>The court quashed the summoning orders for the complaints filed against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court clarified that the cheques issued by the petitioner were for security purposes and not for the discharge of any existing liability. As such, the court held that Section 138 was not applicable in this case, allowing the petitions for quashing the complaints.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273777</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>