<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 80 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13677</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee was not in default for failing to deduct tax at source. The Court emphasized that the exemption granted by the competent authority absolved the assessee from any wrongdoing, as the authority had authorized non-deduction of tax before the deadline for depositing any deducted amount. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 02:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 80 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13677</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the assessee was not in default for failing to deduct tax at source. The Court emphasized that the exemption granted by the competent authority absolved the assessee from any wrongdoing, as the authority had authorized non-deduction of tax before the deadline for depositing any deducted amount. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal, stating that no substantial question of law arose for consideration in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>