<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s refund claim denied as evidence showed MRP included all taxes, failing to prove non-recovery from customers.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40346</link>
    <description>Refund of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - the label/laminate produced by the appellant shows that the MRP is inclusive of all taxes. Thus, the appellant could not establish that the excess duty paid by them during the relevant period has not been recovered from the customers - refund was rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:22:21 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:22:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526834" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s refund claim denied as evidence showed MRP included all taxes, failing to prove non-recovery from customers.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40346</link>
      <description>Refund of excess duty paid - unjust enrichment - the label/laminate produced by the appellant shows that the MRP is inclusive of all taxes. Thus, the appellant could not establish that the excess duty paid by them during the relevant period has not been recovered from the customers - refund was rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 08:22:21 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40346</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>