<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1728 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273772</link>
    <description>Revenue appeal concerning the treatment of foreign exchange fluctuations and brand expenses was not entertained because the asserted question of law was identical to an earlier appeal already declined on the same issue. The Court held that no question of law arose on the facts presented and disposed of the appeal along with the pending application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:16:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1728 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273772</link>
      <description>Revenue appeal concerning the treatment of foreign exchange fluctuations and brand expenses was not entertained because the asserted question of law was identical to an earlier appeal already declined on the same issue. The Court held that no question of law arose on the facts presented and disposed of the appeal along with the pending application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>