<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 828 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363520</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because it was classified as a primary agricultural credit society and the jurisdictional High Court had already recognised such societies&#039; entitlement. The Tribunal distinguished Citizen Co-operative Society on the basis that that case concerned a different factual setting involving banking-like activity and members treated in substance as non-members. It held that, under the Kerala co-operative law, nominal members are recognised as members and the statutory framework did not justify treating the assessee as a co-operative bank for denying the deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 18:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 828 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363520</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act, 1969 remained eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i) because it was classified as a primary agricultural credit society and the jurisdictional High Court had already recognised such societies&#039; entitlement. The Tribunal distinguished Citizen Co-operative Society on the basis that that case concerned a different factual setting involving banking-like activity and members treated in substance as non-members. It held that, under the Kerala co-operative law, nominal members are recognised as members and the statutory framework did not justify treating the assessee as a co-operative bank for denying the deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>