<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 827 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363519</link>
    <description>The Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding the deletion of additions under Section 68 and related to commission paid were dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, finding no need to interfere as facts were similar to a previous assessment year. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument on the admissibility of additional evidence under Rule 46A. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for the relevant assessment years to be legally sound, based on substantial evidence, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals. However, for the assessment year 2011-12, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the AO for reconsideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:14:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 827 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363519</link>
      <description>The Revenue&#039;s challenges regarding the deletion of additions under Section 68 and related to commission paid were dismissed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, finding no need to interfere as facts were similar to a previous assessment year. The Tribunal also dismissed the Revenue&#039;s argument on the admissibility of additional evidence under Rule 46A. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s orders for the relevant assessment years to be legally sound, based on substantial evidence, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals. However, for the assessment year 2011-12, the Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter back to the AO for reconsideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>