<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 826 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals in favor of Radha Mittal and fully in favor of Ruchie Mittal, deleting additions for unexplained jewelry and correcting valuation errors. The Tribunal also addressed consequential interest levies based on the main issues&#039; outcomes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 826 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeals in favor of Radha Mittal and fully in favor of Ruchie Mittal, deleting additions for unexplained jewelry and correcting valuation errors. The Tribunal also addressed consequential interest levies based on the main issues&#039; outcomes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>