<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 794 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363486</link>
    <description>The court held that the Additional Director of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) lacked jurisdiction to invoke Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was no valid notification authorizing such action under Section 2(34). Consequently, the show cause notices issued by the Additional Director General of DRI were quashed for lack of jurisdiction. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with the court directing the parties to receive certified copies of the order upon completion of formalities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 794 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363486</link>
      <description>The court held that the Additional Director of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) lacked jurisdiction to invoke Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962, as there was no valid notification authorizing such action under Section 2(34). Consequently, the show cause notices issued by the Additional Director General of DRI were quashed for lack of jurisdiction. The writ petitions were disposed of accordingly, with the court directing the parties to receive certified copies of the order upon completion of formalities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>