<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 792 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363484</link>
    <description>Denial of cross-examination of the chemical examiner, despite the adjudicating authority having sought clarification on the test report, was held to breach natural justice. As no clarification had been received before the order was passed, the determination was treated as procedurally unfair. Because the dispute involved a live consignment, fresh adjudication with cross-examination was considered necessary, and the impugned order was set aside with remand for a new decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:13:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 792 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363484</link>
      <description>Denial of cross-examination of the chemical examiner, despite the adjudicating authority having sought clarification on the test report, was held to breach natural justice. As no clarification had been received before the order was passed, the determination was treated as procedurally unfair. Because the dispute involved a live consignment, fresh adjudication with cross-examination was considered necessary, and the impugned order was set aside with remand for a new decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>