<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 791 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363483</link>
    <description>Substantial compliance with an export incentive notification was found where Modvat credit had been reversed before the cut-off date, and a minor delay in paying interest in some instances did not defeat entitlement to the Amnesty Scheme. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that belated interest payment alone is not fatal, and also noted that in several export instances no credit had been taken at all. On those facts, the substantive requirement of the scheme was treated as satisfied, and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 06:13:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 791 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363483</link>
      <description>Substantial compliance with an export incentive notification was found where Modvat credit had been reversed before the cut-off date, and a minor delay in paying interest in some instances did not defeat entitlement to the Amnesty Scheme. The Tribunal followed the earlier view that belated interest payment alone is not fatal, and also noted that in several export instances no credit had been taken at all. On those facts, the substantive requirement of the scheme was treated as satisfied, and the demand was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>