<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 790 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363482</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under the Customs Act against two appellants involved in smuggling rough diamonds but reduced the amounts due to excessive imposition, finding their involvement based on unchallenged oral evidence. The modified order partially allowed the appeals, emphasizing the necessity of concrete evidence and fair penalty imposition in smuggling cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 12:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=526787" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 790 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363482</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed under the Customs Act against two appellants involved in smuggling rough diamonds but reduced the amounts due to excessive imposition, finding their involvement based on unchallenged oral evidence. The modified order partially allowed the appeals, emphasizing the necessity of concrete evidence and fair penalty imposition in smuggling cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=363482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>